Cem Ilkel vs Thando Longwe-Smit Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Feb at 09:40 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ilkel vs T. Longwe-Smit

TUR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RSA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Longwe-Smit
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 2 and Thando Longwe-Smit winning 0. The last match between Cem Ilkel and Thando Longwe-Smit was at the M15 Pretoria, 27-02-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Ilkel | 1 |
Longwe-Smit | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Pretoria(02-27-25)
C. Ilkel vs T. Longwe-Smit H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$225,530 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
56.52% (438-337) | Career Total W/L | 53.23% (33-29) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
7 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Ilkel vs T. Longwe-Smit Match Preview:
In this upcoming tennis showdown, Ilkel is likely to have a significant “second” wind with a second serve performance that has him securing 46.86% of points in recent times—eclipsing Longwe-Smit, who isn’t quite second to none with a 37.44%. This statistic is often a prophet of match results, so Ilkel might be serving up a victory surprise.
Speaking of prophecies that don't come from a crystal ball, Ilkel notably claims 42.4% of his opponents' second serve points back to sender, compared to Longwe-Smit who manages a respectful, yet marginally lower, 40.45%. When it comes to first serve returns, Longwe-Smit takes a small nod with 29.55%, elbowing past Ilkel's 24.8%. These figures dance around to help predict the favorite in head-to-head encounters.
Under pressure, when the stakes resemble a high-wire act, Longwe-Smit saves breakpoints 56.25% of the time, which is slightly higher than Ilkel's 52.88% salvation rate. However, Ilkel seems to write the screenplay for match endings in deciding sets, clinching 50% over the year compared to Longwe-Smit’s rather dramatic 0%. If that’s not enough, then witness Ilkel’s advantage on hard surfaces, waving a cool 61% win rate in his career—a statistic that finds Longwe-Smit toe-tapping with a 45% victory dance in his best must-see matches.
Moving over to their performances in smaller tournaments, Ilkel wags his finger with a princely 64.52% win rate, while Longwe-Smit engages in a learning curve with a tidy 40%. And yet, Longwe-Smit appears like a scene-stealer, matching up against opponents ranked as a serious sequel-worthy 210.73 in average rank, compared to Ilkel’s slightly less intimidating cast at 389.3.
In the story of breakpoints—those dramatic moments—the plot twist goes to Ilkel, converting a remarkable 34.43% of break chances. Longwe-Smit isn’t too far behind with a respectable 32%, but it’s less likely to “break” new ground against a well-prepared opponent.
Given all the stats and pre-match analysis, it seems like Ilkel could very well be writing the last chapter in this match saga, standing as the potential victor based on the numbers dancing on their report cards. Let the match begin, and may the best serve win!
Cem Ilkel vs Thando Longwe-Smit Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Ilkel vs T. Longwe-Smit H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 5 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:11:56 | Average Match Time | 1:11:56 |
70% (30/43) | 1st Serve % | 57% (26/46) |
90% (27/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (14/26) |
69% (9/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (11/20) |
100% (3/3) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
46% (21/46) | Return Points Win % | 16% (7/43) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played
T. Longwe-Smit Recent Matches Played

C. Ilkel vs T. Longwe-Smit Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56.52% (438/337) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.23% (33/29) |
54.63% (979/813) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.80% (72/67) |
51.54% (8791/8267) | Games Win/Loss | 51.22% (674/642) |
61.41% (288/181) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.23% (33/29) |
44.53% (57/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
54.76% (92/76) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
10.00% (1/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
2865 | Aces Total | 124 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
1385 | Total Double Faults | 127 |
1:15:9 | Average Match Time | 1:10:47 |
554.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 258.68 |
58% (24152/41308) | 1st Serve % | 57% (1462/2559) |
70% (16999/24152) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (1017/1462) |
51% (8757/17156) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (544/1097) |
40% (1622/4023) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (91/247) |
39% (16247/41803) | Return Points Win % | 38% (993/2626) |
31.82% (7/15) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
66.67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
31.82% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
17.86% (5/23) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
52.23% (176/161) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
66.39% (241/122) | Futures W/L | 53.23% (33/29) |
56% (426/756) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (33/62) |
40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
53% (147/275) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (8/13) |
56% (130/233) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (9/15) |
85% (424/362) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (35/31) |
14% (424/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (35/4) |
21% (350/74) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (27/2) |